Oetzi vs SnitchFeed: intent scoring, and what comes after it

Pick SnitchFeed if you want intent scored alerts on the five platforms where most B2B software conversations happen, and you are comfortable writing the answer yourself. Pick Oetzi if you want the same scoring on seven platforms and then a reply drafted in your voice, a posting plan fed by those threads, and AI engine visibility tracked alongside. This is the closest comparison here, because the front half of the job is the same.

What SnitchFeed does well

SnitchFeed skipped the mistake most of this category made. It does not send you every post containing a keyword. It scores alerts for intent on Reddit, X, LinkedIn, Bluesky, and Hacker News, the five places a B2B software buyer is most likely to ask what people use. That is the right five if you have to pick five. The company also does its homework in public, running per platform monitoring pages and comparisons against its rivals rather than hiding behind a demo form. You can see the current plans on its pricing page.

So where is the difference?

Not in finding the thread. Both tools read the post and judge whether someone is actually deciding. If your whole job is a filtered inbox, SnitchFeed does that job and the comparison is close to a coin flip on coverage.

The difference is the half of the work that starts after the alert. Oetzi drafts two replies in your voice for any conversation and publishes nothing without your approval. It pulls the people who engaged into a people graph so nobody hears from you twice. It measures share of model across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, and Google AI, then shows the threads those answers cited. And it drafts posts on a cadence from what the market said that week.

SnitchFeed does not publish drafting, approval, posting, or AI engine tracking, so assume that work is yours.

Two more platforms and a rubric you can read

Oetzi listens on the same five plus Threads and Substack Notes. Every match returns a 0 to 100 intent score with the reason written out and a tag for who is talking: buyer, current customer, feature request, or competitor user. Both tools solve the noise problem. Oetzi shows its reasoning and lets you correct it.

Pick SnitchFeed if

• Five platforms cover your category and you do not need Threads or Substack Notes
• You want scored alerts and nothing else in the way
• You write your own replies and would not use a draft

Pick Oetzi if

• You want the reply drafted and approved by you, not just the thread found
• You want the same week's threads to become next week's posts on a posting plan
• You want AI engine visibility measured next to listening rather than in a second subscription
• You want an agent in Claude Code or Cursor to run sweeps and read matches with spend caps

Questions

Is SnitchFeed the same thing as Oetzi?

For the first half, close. Both score conversations for buying intent instead of sending raw keyword hits, and both watch Reddit, X, LinkedIn, Bluesky, and Hacker News. They part company after the alert. Oetzi adds two platforms, drafts replies and posts in your voice, tracks AI engine answers, and exposes all of it to agents over an API.

Which platforms does each one watch?

SnitchFeed lists Reddit, X, LinkedIn, Bluesky, and Hacker News. Oetzi listens on those five plus Threads and Substack Notes. If your buyers are on Threads or write on Substack, that gap matters. If they are not, the platform lists are effectively the same and you should decide on what happens after the match instead.

Does SnitchFeed write replies for me?

The vendor does not publish a drafting or approval feature, so plan on writing your own. That is a defensible scope: some founders would rather write every reply themselves than edit a draft. Oetzi takes the other side and drafts two variants in your voice for every conversation, with the reason it scored the way it did, and waits for you to send one.